How to buy mutual funds from Thrivent

We’re delighted you’re considering Thrivent Mutual Funds. No matter how you buy, we’re here to help you invest with confidence.

Buy online through Thrivent Funds

You can open an account and purchase funds right on our site.

Why buy online?

  • Set up an account starting with as little as $50 per month1
  • Access your online account at your convenience.
  • Purchase funds without transaction fees or sales charges.


Buy through a financial professional

Need more guidance? Ask your financial professional about Thrivent Mutual Funds.

Why work with a financial professional?

  • Receive investment help from an experienced professional.
  • Build a relationship through in-person meetings.
  • Get help planning for life’s goals such as saving and retirement.

Additional fees may apply, when working with a financial professional.


Buy through an investment account

Our funds can be purchased through other online brokerage platforms. Search for Thrivent Mutual Funds when making your selections.

Why buy through a brokerage account?

  • Add Thrivent Mutual Funds to investments within your existing portfolio.
  • Take advantage of your account to keep your investments in one place.

Additional fees may apply.


Not quite ready?

We want you to invest your money wisely and with confidence. Here are some other options that may help you.


Need more help?

Call or email us.

M-F, 8 a.m. – 6 p.m. CT
Say “” for faster service. or,
Visit our support page


1 New accounts with a minimum investment amount of $50 are offered through the Thrivent Mutual Funds “automatic purchase plan.” Otherwise, the minimum initial investment requirement is $2,000 for non-retirement accounts and $1,000 for IRA or tax-deferred accounts, minimum subsequent investment requirement is $50 for all account types. $50 a month automatic investment does not apply to the Thrivent Money Market Fund or Thrivent Limited Maturity Bond Fund, which have a minimum monthly investment of $100.

Now leaving


You're about to visit a site that is neither owned nor operated by Thrivent Mutual Funds.

In the interest of protecting your information, we recommend you review the privacy policies at your destination site.


Banking industry: Early reports on impact from COVID-19


By Mark Simenstad, Chief Investment Strategist | 4/22/2020

The banking industry is the most unique of the major industries in the functioning of the global economy. Banking is at the nexus of the economy, the capital markets and the functioning of the global payment system. In times of financial crises, it’s the industry that is most closely monitored and most closely targeted for government policy response and regulation. 

Bank earnings, and more importantly what banks are doing to reserve for expected loan losses, provide real-time insight into the current and expected future state of the economy. Banking is traditionally one of the first industries to release quarterly earnings announcements. In the past few weeks many large banks have released earnings announcements for the first quarter of 2020. They provide some early indication of how this crisis is impacting the economy, corporations and consumers.  

The banking industry’s first quarter results have thus far been primarily challenged by higher-than-expected loan loss reserve provisions in light of the economic impact of the COVID-19 virus. Banks are required to estimate costs in terms of expected losses due to credit defaults and impairments. These higher loss estimates are an indication of the severity of this crisis. Bank profit margins from lending activity (net interest margins) were also negatively impacted as the cost of funding loans rose. Commercial loan volumes surged as credit lines were drawn by borrowers in a frenzied scramble for cash. However, interest rates earned by banks on these short-term loans were not immediately commensurate with rising short-term bank funding costs. Although quarterly banking results have thus far been challenging overall, it is important to note that the large banks that have reported thus far remain profitable and continue to have access to capital and to pay dividends to shareholders.  

Banks with large trading desks benefited from the sharp increase in market volatility. Volatile markets can contribute to trading profits for banks that have large broker/dealer businesses. However, profits from these businesses can quickly and significantly diminish once volatility and trading volumes decline.  

The main concerns for investors are: 1) how severe will loan losses ultimately be, 2) will lending profitability (net interest margin) improve, and 3) how well positioned is the industry to weather this crisis? 

Banking industry fundamentally more sound than financial crisis of 2008 

Despite the challenging operating conditions, the banking industry enters this downturn in a much stronger position compared to the financial crisis of 2008. Thanks to a decade of Federal Reserve stress testing, banks have much lower leverage, cleaner balance sheets, and higher levels of liquidity that should help them exit this downturn in much better shape than in prior recessions. Yet, even bank managements admit the lack of modern global pandemic precedents makes forecasting loss rates much more challenging. As a result, the largest banks boosted reserves in the first quarter by about 65%, or 2-3% of their loans, to cover estimated potential losses, representing approximately 60% of the losses forecast in prior Fed stress test scenarios. The reserves are large, but more will likely be needed in the coming quarters as more information is gathered about the severity of the COVID-19 impact on the economy and the potential benefit of the government’s support programs on credit losses. Despite this uncertainty, the banks appear to be positioned to be part of the solution in this ‘Great Lockdown’ recession rather than a source of the problem as they were in the Great Financial Crisis. 

One of the keys to longer term profitability (net interest margin) for the banking system is having access to low-cost funding. As the financial crisis has driven short-term interest rates to approximately 0%, consumers have increased their savings deposits. This is an attractive source of low-cost funding for banks.  

Banks have also taken advantage of the stability in the bond market (thanks to unprecedented Federal Reserve policies) by issuing large amounts of longer maturing bonds. As an example, JP Morgan was able to issue $10 billion in bonds, the largest amount ever by a bank, at an interest cost of about 2.5%. This would not have been possible at this stage of the 2008 financial crisis. Confidence in the banking system, as manifest in this low-cost combination of funding, is an important element to recovery in the economy, the banking industry financial profile, and the capital markets. 

Banking industry: Outlook 

The banking industry is positioned to weather the economic storm caused by the coronavirus crisis. However, returns to investors in bank securities will be more uncertain than other industries given the vagaries surrounding ultimate credit losses, interest rates and net interest margins. Year to date, the banking sector has been one of the worst performing sectors, down more than 40% as measured by the KBW Bank Index. This same index shows that banks are now trading at about 80% of book value, a historically “cheap” valuation. This reflects the uncertainties around the assets on bank balance sheets. However, as opposed to the Great Financial Crisis, when many bank balance sheets contained esoteric securities that led to excessive losses, the impact of the current recession will center on the financial health of each bank’s loan customers, which is being supported, to some extent, by new and expanded government programs.  

For an income investor, the banking industry provides numerous investment alternatives. The lowest-risk source of income from bank securities is from bonds. The JP Morgan issues mentioned previously are a good example of bond yields available on the highest quality banks, at approximately 2.5-3.00%. Moving up the risk spectrum are preferred stocks issued by banks. Although banks could cut or eliminate these dividends if severe credit losses materialize, it does not appear that the industry is contemplating this move as of now even after taking relatively significant reserves for losses. Currently the average preferred stock dividend yield is approximately 6% as measured by the ICE Preferred Securities Index. An income investor in bank preferred stocks should be aware that there are frequently call provisions with these securities which make their ultimate maturities uncertain. The final and highest risk income option for investors is bank common stock. The average common stock dividend yield, as measured by the KBW Bank Index, is approximately 4.5%. These dividends are even more at risk than preferred stock dividends if credit losses become more serious and/or regulators demand their omission. However, if bank stocks recover, meaningful capital gains are possible.  

Mark Simenstad
Chief Investment Strategist

Investing Insights newsletter

A monthly digest of market events and our perspectives around them.

Wall Street to Your Street alerts

A timely alert of newly-posted market updates.

All information and representations herein are as of 4/22/2020, unless otherwise noted.

The views expressed are as of the date given, may change as market or other conditions change, and may differ from views expressed by other Thrivent Asset Management, LLC associates. Actual investment decisions made by Thrivent Asset Management, LLC will not necessarily reflect the views expressed. This information should not be considered investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or product.  Investment decisions should always be made based on an investor's specific financial needs, objectives, goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance.

Any indexes shown are unmanaged and do not reflect the typical costs of investing. Investors cannot invest directly in an index.

Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Related content